Exactly what are common risks associated with FDI in the MENA region

Exactly what are common risks associated with FDI in the MENA region

Blog Article

Risk research reports have mainly concentrated on political risks, usually overlooking the critical effect of cultural factors on investment sustainability.

Although political uncertainty generally seems to take over media coverage on the Middle East, in recent times, the region—and particularly the Arabian Gulf—has seen a stable upsurge in international direct investment (FDI). The Middle East and Arab Gulf markets have become more and more attractive for FDI. Nonetheless, the prevailing research how multinational corporations perceive area specific risks is scarce and often lacks depth, an undeniable fact attorneys and danger specialists like Louise Flanagan in Ras Al Khaimah would likely be aware of. Studies on risks associated with FDI in the region tend to overstate and predominantly focus on political dangers, such as for example government uncertainty or policy modifications that may affect investments. But recent research has started to illuminate a critical yet often overlooked aspect, namely the effects of cultural factors on the sustainability of foreign investments in the Arab Gulf. Indeed, a number of studies expose that numerous businesses and their administration teams significantly disregard the impact of cultural differences, mainly due to a lack of understanding of these cultural variables.

Pioneering scientific studies on dangers associated with international direct investments in the MENA region offer fresh insights, attempting to bridge the gap in empirical knowledge regarding the risk perceptions and management methods of Western multinational corporations active widely in the region. For instance, a study involving several major international businesses within the GCC countries revealed some interesting findings. It argued that the risks connected with foreign investments are a great deal more complicated than simply political or exchange rate risks. Cultural risks are perceived as more essential than governmental, economic, or economic risks in accordance with survey data . Additionally, the research discovered that while aspects of Arab culture strongly influence the business environment, numerous foreign organisations find it difficult to adapt to local traditions and routines. This trouble in adapting constitutes a danger dimension that will require further investigation and a change in how multinational corporations operate in the region.

Focusing on adjusting to regional culture is important not adequate for successful integration. Integration is a loosely defined concept involving many things, such as for example appreciating regional values, understanding decision-making styles beyond a restricted transactional business viewpoint, and looking into societal norms that influence company practices. In GCC countries, effective business interactions are more than just transactional interactions. What impacts employee motivation and job satisfaction vary greatly across countries. Thus, to seriously incorporate your business in the Middle East two things are expected. Firstly, a corporate mindset change in risk management beyond economic risk management tools, as consultants and solicitors such as Salem Al Kait and Ammar Haykal in Ras Al Khaimah would probably suggest. Next, techniques that can be effortlessly implemented on the ground to translate this new approach into action.